Introduction
This study investigated the survival rates of occupants of passenger cars involved in a fatal crash between 2000 and 2003.
Methods
The information from every fatal crash in the United States between 2000 and 2003 was analyzed. Variables such as seat position, point of impact, rollover, restraint use, vehicle type, vehicle weight, occupant age, and injury severity were extracted from the Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS). Univariate and a full logistic multivariate model analyses were performed.
Results
The data show that the rear middle seat is safer than any other occupant position when involved in a fatal crash. Overall, the rear (2nd row) seating positions have a 29.1% (Univariate Analysis, p < .0001, OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.22 – 1.37) increased odds of survival over the first row seating positions and the rear middle seat has a 25% (Univariate Analysis, p < .0001, OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.17 – 1.34) increased odds of survival over the other rear seat positions. After correcting for potential confounders, occupants of the rear middle seat have a 13% (Logistic Regression, p < .001, 95% CI 1.02 – 1.26) increased chance of survival when involved in a crash with a fatality than occupants in other rear seats.
Conclusion
This study has shown that the safest position for any occupant involved in a motor-vehicle crash is the rear middle seat.
Source: “The safest seat: Effect of seating position on occupant mortality” from Journal of Safety Research, Volume 39, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 433-436
Digests of posts:
Things you didn’t know about sex
How to quickly and easily improve your life
Things you didn’t know about sports
Things you didn’t know about happiness
Things you didn’t know about lies, liars and detecting lies
Things you didn’t know about negotiation, persuasion and influence