Headshot portraits of all U.S. Governors, Senators, and Representatives and members of Parliament in Canada, Australia, and Norway are analyzed. In all countries, male politicians are represented with higher facial prominence than female politicians, paralleling a pervasive gender bias in media portraits. For American Congresswomen, high facial prominence is associated with a more pro-feminist voting record. Finally, anthropometric data show that gender differences in the facial prominence in portraits cannot be traced to gender differences in actual body proportions.
Source: “Do Male Politicians Have Big Heads? Face-ism in Online Self-Representations of Politicians” from Media Psychology, Volume 10, Issue 3 September 2007 , pages 436 – 448
I’ve started posting extra content on the blog’s Facebook page. Don’t miss out; go here and hit the “Like” button.
You can also subscribe via email, RSS, or Twitter. Check out the site’s most popular posts of all time.
Related Posts:
Are conservative politicians better looking than liberals?
Are the stereotypes about liberals and conservatives true?
Among politicians, are Republicans or Democrats more likely to adopt Twitter?
Can you tell if someone is a Republican or Democrat just by looking at their face?
Are you left wing — or do you just think you are?
Why politics is a mess and it’s all your fault
How can you easily get more people to vote?
Why do politicians rarely change their positions?
Why do political incumbents have an advantage?
You know why that country’s citizens are miserable? Too many colors in their flag.
When it comes to politics, this is how shallow we are
Do liberals and conservatives dream differently?
How do our political leanings affect our investing?
Does America thrive because the poor don’t vote?
How to tell which countries are corrupt… by looking at traffic tickets
Is corruption widespread in Congress?
Is corruption the problem or just the wrong *kind* of corruption?