Research Highlights
► Attorney type has no significant direct effect on four case processing outcomes: the release decision, the decision to reduce the primary charge, the incarceration decision, and the sentence length decision.
► Tests for interaction reveal that for some defendants, type of counsel interacts with other key variables to influence certain outcomes.
► Results suggest that there is little difference in the ‘quality’ of legal defense provided to defendants by private attorneys and public defenders.
► Mixed results were found for the idea of a case processing system characterized by the courtroom workgroup model of administration of justice. In some contexts defendants benefited from being represented by the public defender; in other contexts, defendants represented by private attorneys fared better.
Follow me on Twitter here or get updates via email here.
Related posts:
Do women receive lighter prison sentences than men? If so, why?